Understanding the Fundamental Elements and Categories of Mechanical Seals

Mechanical seals are critical components in rotating equipment, providing reliable sealing solutions in diverse industrial applications. They consist of several key elements, each with specific functions that contribute to overall performance and longevity. This article explores the fundamental components of mechanical seals and compares different seal types to assist engineers in making informed selection decisions.

Primary Sealing Elements

The core of a mechanical seal consists of the primary sealing elements, which include a primary ring and a mating ring—often collectively referred to as seal faces. These components work together to form the primary sealing interface. The mating ring is typically made from a ceramic or a ceramic-metal composite (cermet), while the primary ring may be composed of carbon graphite, ceramic, or cermet. One of these rings is affixed to the rotating shaft, while the other is attached to the stationary housing.

A thin fluid film between these two rings provides lubrication, but this also creates the primary leak path. Mechanical seal design must minimize this leakage while maintaining the correct fluid film thickness. Even small shaft movements can significantly affect leakage, necessitating axial movement capabilities in the primary ring while keeping the mating ring stationary.

Secondary Sealing Elements

Secondary sealing elements prevent leakage at points other than the primary sealing interface. These elements do not require lubrication and are designed for a complete seal. They can be categorized into dynamic and static secondary sealing elements:

• Dynamic secondary sealing elements accommodate axial movement of the primary ring. These include:
  • Pusher seals: Utilize elastomer O-rings, allowing movement along the shaft.
  • Non-pusher seals: Employ elastomer or metal bellows, which deform rather than move.
• Static secondary sealing elements have no axial movement and typically use O-rings or gaskets to maintain a tight seal.

Drive Elements

Drive elements transmit torque between rotating components and prevent unintended rotation of stationary parts. These include:

• Set screws, pins, dents, and tabs
• Squeezed elastomers and keys

One example of a drive element is the retainer, which either drives the rotating primary ring or secures the stationary mating ring.

Load Elements

Load elements maintain contact between the primary and mating rings, preventing separation when hydraulic pressure is low. These include:

• Multiple coil springs
• A single large coil spring
• Metal bellows

These components ensure adequate sealing performance during startup, shutdown, and pressure fluctuations.

Adaptive Hardware

Adaptive hardware allows for flexible installation and compatibility with various equipment configurations. Common examples include:

• Gland plates (end plates) for mounting stationary components
• Sleeves for securing rotating components
• Cartridge seals, which integrate all components into a self-contained unit for easier installation

Comparing Mechanical Seal Configurations

Mechanical seals are classified based on their arrangement and construction:

• Single seals: Simple and cost-effective but less reliable for hazardous fluids.
• Dual-pressurized seals: Use a barrier fluid at higher pressure than the process fluid, preventing leakage to the atmosphere.
• Dual-unpressurized seals: Utilize a lower-pressure buffer fluid, reducing emissions and providing redundancy.

Other key configuration factors include:

• Rotating vs. stationary primary rings: Stationary primary rings offer better stability at high speeds.
• Seal face orientation:
  • Face-to-back: Common for dual-unpressurized seals.
  • Back-to-back and face-to-face: Preferred for dual-pressurized seals.
  • Outer diameter (OD) pressurization: Generally more effective than inner diameter (ID) pressurization, reducing leakage and improving component strength.

Performance Considerations

Several factors impact seal performance, including:

• Pressure resistance: O-ring seals handle higher pressures than metal bellows due to structural differences.
• Chemical compatibility: Metal bellows seals offer superior material options for aggressive fluids.
• Rotational speed: Rotating mating ring configurations are better suited for high speeds due to their stability.
• Cost efficiency: Elastomer bellows seals are typically the most economical, while metal bellows seals are more expensive due to their complexity.

Cartridge vs. Component Seals

Cartridge seals, though larger and more expensive, simplify installation and reduce maintenance risks by integrating all necessary components. They also allow pre-installation pressure testing, ensuring reliability before deployment. In contrast, component seals require careful alignment during installation, making them less user-friendly.

Selecting the appropriate mechanical seal is crucial for optimizing equipment efficiency and reliability. While manufacturers offer various seal types tailored to specific applications, understanding the fundamental elements of mechanical seals provides a strong foundation for decision-making. Whether considering single or dual seals, pusher or non-pusher designs, or cartridge versus component configurations, engineers must evaluate all factors to achieve the best sealing performance for their operating conditions.

For those interested in reading the full Sealing Sense Article “Basic Elements & Categories of Mechanical Seals” click here.